在先秦典籍中,《庄子》是一个特异的存在,其他典籍如《论语》、《老子》、《韩非子》,或儒或道或法,可谓泾渭分明,研究者并没有什么异议。而在《庄子》阐释史上,有以道解庄者,有以儒解庄者,有以佛解庄者,可谓众说纷纭。林希逸在《庄子鬳斋口义·发题》中说:“况此书所言仁义性命之类,字义皆与吾书不同,一难也;其意欲与吾夫子争衡,故其言多过当,二难也;鄙畧中下之人,如佛书所谓为最上乘者说,故其言每每过高,三难也;又其笔端鼓舞变化, Among the pre-Qin classics, ”Zhuangzi“ is a peculiar existence. The other classics such as The Analects, Laozi, Hanfeizi, Confucianism or Taoism or the law can be said to be completely different, and the researchers have no objection. In the interpretation history of ”Zhuangzi“, there are different opinions on the basis of Taoist Zhuangs, Confucianist Zhuangs, and Chuangzhuang Zhuangs. Lin Xi-yi said in Zhuangzi Zhaizhai’s Quotations: ”In the case of this book, the meanings of righteousness and life are all different from those of my book, Fight, dilemma also; despise people, such as the so-called Buddha book for the most superior, so its words are often too high, the three difficulties; and his pen inspired changes,