高考政治的主观性试题一般有一、两段文字材料,涉及的知识点纷繁复杂,跨章节考查学生综合运用知识的能力,因此,多数考生都感觉主观性材料分析题难以全面把握和准确作答。纵观近几年的高考题,笔者发现这样一个现象:很多材料分析题的答案或多或少都现成地存在于材料之中,考生只需要动笔把一些字句“抄”在问题之下即可得到部分分数,只不过要讲究“抄”的艺术性与科学性。一、直接抄顾名思义,就是当材料中呈现的文字信息与问题设置紧密相连,用这些文字信息恰好就能对问题作出回答时,考生就可直接从材料中“复制”相关字句,“粘贴”而成答案要点。下面这道题曾出现在四川省的水平测试模拟试题之中:党的十六大报告指出, The subjects of the college entrance examination are generally subject to one or two paragraphs of text material. The knowledge involved is complex and cross-sections examine the students’ ability to use knowledge comprehensively. Therefore, most candidates feel that subjective material analysis questions are difficult to fully grasp and accurately answer. Looking at the college entrance examination questions in recent years, the author finds such a phenomenon: Many answers to material analysis questions are more or less readily available in materials. Candidates only need to write a few words “copy” under the question. You can get a partial score, but you should pay attention to the artistic and scientific nature of “copying”. I. Directly copying the name implies that when the text information presented in the material is closely linked with the problem setting, if the text information can be used to answer the question, the examinee can directly “copy” the related words from the material. Paste " from the answer. The following question has appeared in the level test simulation test questions in Sichuan Province: The report of the 16th Party Congress pointed out that