在对儒家学说中是否存在道德情感主义理论中的核心概念——感同身受的讨论中,国内学者和斯洛特都将目光投向了孟子。国内学者认为孟子的恻隐之心是在讨论感同身受,而斯洛特则认为孟子的“万物皆备于我”才是感同身受。这两种观点实际上都存在问题。恻隐之心、万物皆备于我更多的是推己及人,孟子没有谈论过感同身受。斯洛特的道德情感主义和儒家思想的相似更多地是在精神气质上的相似,而非具体观点、概念上的相似。 In discussing whether Confucianism contains the core concept of moral sentiment theory-empathy-both Chinese scholars and Slobat have set their sights on Mencius. Domestic scholars think Mencius’s implicit heart is in the discussion of empathy, and Sloter believes that Mencius “everything is prepared for me ” is empathy. Both of these views actually have problems. Hidden heart, all things are prepared for me more is to promote others, Mencius did not talk about empathy. Slaughter’s similarities between moral sentiment and Confucianism are more similar in spirit temperament, not concrete ideas, conceptual similarities.