论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:我局于2007年9月12日,对市属的光明造纸厂王大宁受伤是否为工伤案件进行了处理。该事故是2007年4月30日发生的,受害方向仲裁委提出仲裁,厂方以王大宁“酗酒”为由,不承认其为工伤。在认定中我们对照调查取征询问笔录和现场勘察绘图,调查人员进行了反复推敲和分析,大家认为,受伤人王大宁在上班时间、工作地点,干了与工作有关的事情受的伤,喝酒没有达到醉酒程度,我们作出王大宁为工伤的认定。光明造纸厂对我局作出的工伤决定不服,诉到法庭,在法庭辩论中,造纸厂代理人对酗酒一词解释有异义,认为不管喝多少,不胜酒力就是酗酒,就是已经醉酒了。因为双方都没有一个明确的可以量化的法律法规依据,至今案件仍未解决完毕。特此请问编辑同志,什么样的程度为醉酒,因醉酒导致的工伤是指哪些表现?
Editorial comrades: I Council on September 12, 2007, the municipal Guangming Paper Mill injured Wang Daning whether the case of work-related injuries were dealt with. The accident occurred on April 30, 2007, and the direction of the Arbitration Commission of Armed Forces was put forward for arbitration. The factory did not recognize it as an industrial injury on the grounds that Wang Daning and “alcoholism” were the cause. In the confirmation, we took the record of the investigation and the scene investigation drawing according to the survey, and the investigators carried out repeated scrutiny and analysis. It is believed that the injured Wang Daning was injured in work time and place of work and was hurt by the work and did not drink alcohol To reach the level of drunkenness, we made Wang Daning identification of work-related injuries. In the court debate, the paper mill agent explained the term alcoholism has different meaning, that no matter how much to drink, alcohol is alcoholism, is already drunk. Because neither side has a clear and quantifiable basis for laws and regulations, so far the case has not yet been resolved. Hereby, I would like to ask my comrades, what is the extent of drunkenness and what are the manifestations of work-related injuries caused by drunkenness?