论文部分内容阅读
孙子曰:“夫未战而庙算胜者,得算多也;未战而庙算不胜者,得算少也。”研究军事的人们都热衷于评估武器的作战能力,给同类武器排座次则是进行这类评估的最简单和最直观的方式。必须指出,评估现代航空兵器的作战能力,是一件极其复杂的工作,简直就是一项工程。评估方法很多,如性能对比、计算评估、专家评估、计算机模拟和实兵演习等等,这些方法都各有千秋,也很难强求一致。本文虽为评估篇,但也只能对苏-27系列飞机的综合作战能力作一个定性的分析和大致评价。自古以来,评价一件武器的好坏主要有两个要素——火力和机动力,进入信息时代以后,有人又提出了一个信息力的评价要素。那么我们就从这三个方面入手,来评价一下苏-27及其对手们的孰优孰劣。作为一家之言,与大家探讨。
The grandson said: "People who study war are determined to assess the combat capability of weapons and give weapons of the same type Row seating is the easiest and most intuitive way to do this type of assessment. It must be pointed out that assessing the combat capability of modern aviation weapons is an extremely complicated task and is simply a project. There are many evaluation methods, such as performance comparison, calculation and evaluation, expert evaluation, computer simulation and military exercises, etc. These methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and they are also hard to be consistent. Although this article is an assessment article, it can only make a qualitative analysis and general evaluation of the comprehensive combat capability of the Su -27 series aircraft. Since ancient times, there have been two main elements in evaluating the quality of a weapon: firepower and motivation. After entering the information age, some people have put forward an evaluation element of information power. Then we start from these three aspects, to evaluate Su -27 and its opponents which one is better. As one of the words, to discuss with you.