论文部分内容阅读
当前,非法证据排除规则是我国刑事诉讼理论界所探讨的热点问题之一。在这其中,有学者论及,“从以上所述的联合国以及其他国家的有关非法证据排除规则的情况看,其重视和完备程度似乎都不如美国。美国的非法证据排除规则发展有百年历史,形成了一整套的制度,包括排除的程序和例外情况,而联合国和各国规定的没有这么具体”。[1]所以本文从展示美国非法证据排除规则的演进为切入点,借此着力分析该规则运行的司法环境,[2]并进而希望能够发现一些对于完善我国的非法证据排除规则有益的线索。
At present, the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence is one of the hot issues discussed by China’s criminal litigation theory circles. In this regard, some scholars have argued that “From the above-mentioned United Nations and other countries on the rule of illegal exclusion rules, the attention and the degree of completion seems to be less than the United States.United States illegal evidence evasion rule has a hundred years of history , A system of rules has been formed, including exclusionary procedures and exceptions, which the United Nations and the various nations have not specified. ” Therefore, this article starts with the demonstration of the evolution of the exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in the United States, and tries hard to analyze the judicial environment in which the rule operates. [2] In the hope of discovering some clues useful for perfecting the rule of illegal evidence exclusion in our country.