论文部分内容阅读
虽然并不是对待任何事物都能采用辩证逆向思维,但科普期刊的编辑学会使用辩证逆向思维看待问题,将有利于对科普期刊编辑工作内涵的认识与理解,并有效地指导期刊编辑工作的实践活动。本文拟从科普期刊编辑的角度,利用辩证逆向思维方法,试对当前科普期刊中几个带有普遍性、实质性的问题进行探讨、分析,以求从期刊编辑学理论和实践上获得新的认识和提高。现实与实现业界内外对我国科普期刊的出版现状一直颇有微词。业内众多有识之士早就对科普期刊出版存在的困境、问题的缘由和发展的“瓶颈”等有所高论,但是现实的改观并不大。究其原因有三。
Although dialectical and reverse thinking can not be adopted for everything, the editorial board of science magazines treat the problem with dialectical reverse thinking, which is good for understanding and comprehending the content of science journal editing and effectively guiding the practice of journal editorial work. . This article intends to use the method of dialectical reverse thinking to explore and analyze some common and substantive problems in current popular science journals from the point of view of science journals editors in order to gain new ideas from the theory and practice of journal editorship Recognize and improve. Reality and Realization Both the inside and outside the industry have been quite criticized for the status quo of publishing of popular science journals in our country. Many people of insight in the industry have long been plight of the publication of popular science journals, the reasons for the problems and the bottleneck of development. However, the actual changes are not large. There are three reasons for this.