论文部分内容阅读
余一中先生在本刊2004第9期发表文章,对李辉凡、张捷所著《20世纪俄罗斯文学史》提出批评。依公平原则,本期为李、张先生反驳余文提供版面(我们删去了与辩论无关的话)。媒体是发表言论的公共平台,是非读者当能明鉴。两位先生认为:“我们历来主张对苏联的整个历史和文学发展的历史采取实事求是的分析态度,肯定一切和否定一切都是错误的。”余文“否认苏联建设的是社会主义,否定苏联人民所取得的伟大成就,把苏联社会描绘得一团漆黑,把反对苏联社会制度的种种言论奉为圭臬,把包括《钢铁是怎样炼成的》在内的反映社会生活光明面及革命斗争和建设成就的文学作品一概加以否定,而把暴露和批判现实的作品一律尊为经典。这是他与我们的根本分歧所在”。
In his article No.9, 2004, Mr. Yu Yizhong published an article criticizing Li Huifan and Zhang Jie’s “History of Russian Literature in the 20th Century.” In accordance with the principle of fairness, this issue is for Lee and Mr. Zhang to disprove Yuwen’s provision of layout (we delete the words irrelevant to the debate). The media is a public platform for speech and non-readers should learn from it. The two gentlemen think: “We have always advocated a pragmatic analytical attitude towards the history of the Soviet Union and the history of the development of literature, affirming everything and negating everything is wrong.” Yu Wen denied that the Soviet Union is building socialism and denying the people of the Soviet Union The great achievements made have depicted the Soviet society in such darkness as darkness. He has categorized all kinds of remarks opposing the Soviet social system as a pretext to include works of literature that reflect the bright face of social life and revolutionary struggles and achievements in construction, including “how steel is made” Denied it all, and treated all the works exposed and critiquing the real as the classic, which is where he and our fundamental differences lie. "