读了今年第六期《新闻战线》上《地市县报园地》专栏刊登的《总编辑亲自撰写评论》一文,产生了一些想法。鹤岗日报总编辑傅玺政写评论,本是新闻界的光荣传统,也是总编辑们的“份内事”,现在却要在“撰写”之前冠以“亲自”二字,可见,这“份内事”正在变为“份外事”。这不是笔者在这里瞎估摸。今年春天,我曾在一个全省报纸副刊会议上询问了十几位地市报纸的编辑,回答是,没有一家报社的总编亲自写评论。平心再想,这似乎也不能全怪总编辑们。事务缠身,会议接踵,往往拖得他们精疲力尽,思路闭塞,很难有时间,有精力去“鉴古”、“察今”。再加上方方面面某些人又总爱“自动对号”,总编辑们和我们普通评论作者一样,往往也是论笔未下,芒刺在背,如此一而再,再而三,心生“多一事不如少一事”,这也是人之常情。 After reading the article entitled “The Editor-in-Chief wrote a commentary” in the column entitled “City and County Newspaper and Memorial Garden” published in the sixth issue of the “News Fence,” some thoughts arose. The editor in chief of Hegang Daily Fu Xi political comments, this is the glorious tradition of the press, but also the editors of the “internal affairs”, but now in the “writing” before the word “personally”, we can see that this “copy Things ”are becoming“ foreign affairs. ” This is not the author here blindly estimated. This spring, I asked the editors of a dozen city newspapers at a newspaper supplement meeting in the province. In the answer, no editor of a newspaper personally wrote a comment. Just think again, it seems that we can not blame the chief editors. Business-ridden, meeting one after another, often dragged them exhausted, ideas blocked, it is difficult to have time, have the energy to “Kam ancient”, “observe present.” In addition, some people in all aspects always love “automatic check”. The chief editors, like our ordinary review writers, often make no comments about them, and prickle them on the back. Little less ", which is also human nature.