论文部分内容阅读
目的观察负压球、引流袋结合引流在骨科脊柱手术及关节置换术后的疗效。方法研究对象为2015年7月—2016年7月该院收治的骨科脊柱手术及关节置换术患者60例,根据随机方法划分为对照组(术后采用常规的引流方式)和研究组(采用负压球、引流袋结合引流方式)各30例,对两组最终的疗效进行分析和对比。结果给予不同的引流方式之后,研究组患者在引流时间、引流量以及引流更换次数情况均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组感染率为13.3%;研究组感染率为3.3%,研究组的感染率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论负压球、引流袋结合引流在骨科脊柱手术及关节置换术中具有极高的应用价值,可提高治疗疗效,减少感染发生,并减少引流时间,该方法值得推广。
Objective To observe the effect of negative pressure ball and drainage bag combined with drainage on orthopedic spine surgery and joint replacement. Methods From July 2015 to July 2016, 60 patients undergoing orthopedic spine surgery and arthroplasty in our hospital were divided into control group (conventional drainage method) and study group (negative Pressure ball, drainage bag combined with drainage) in the 30 cases of the final effect of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results After giving different ways of drainage, the study group was superior to the control group in the time of drainage, the amount of drainage and the number of drainage replacement, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); the control group infection rate was 13.3% The rate of infection was 3.3% in the study group, which was lower than that in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions The combination of negative pressure ball and drainage bag with drainage in the treatment of orthopedic spine surgery and arthroplasty has a high value, which can improve the curative effect, reduce the incidence of infection and reduce the drainage time. This method is worthy of popularization.