论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡的临床疗效。方法:以深圳市宝安区中医院2013年1月至2014年1月确诊的150例消化性溃疡患者为研究对象,将其随机分成3组,对照1组(中医对照组),对照2组(西医对照组),观察组(中西医结合组),每组50人,比较3组的治疗效果。结果:观察组患者临床总有效率为98%;对照1组为84%;对照2组为86%;观察组临床治愈率及总有效率均显著高于对照1组、对照2组(P<0.05)。对照1组幽门螺杆菌根除率为80%、对照2组幽门螺杆菌根除率为70%、观察组幽门螺杆菌根除率为90%观察组显著高于对照1组和对照2组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3组不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:中西医结合治疗消化性溃疡在临床上有很好的疗效,不良反应发生率低,复发率低。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine in the treatment of peptic ulcer. Methods: A total of 150 patients with peptic ulcer diagnosed from January 2013 to January 2014 in Bao’an District Hospital of Shenzhen were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: control group 1 (control group) and control group 2 Western medicine control group), observation group (Integrative Medicine group), each group of 50 people, compared the treatment effect of three groups. Results: The total clinical effective rate was 98% in observation group, 84% in control group 1 and 86% in control group 2. The clinical cure rate and total effective rate in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group 1 and control group 2 (P < 0.05). In control group 1, the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori was 80%, that of control group 2 was 70%, the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori in the observation group was 90%, the observation group was significantly higher than the control group 1 and the control group 2 Significance (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the three groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Integrative Chinese medicine treatment of peptic ulcer in the clinical have a good effect, the incidence of adverse reactions is low, the recurrence rate is low.