这是无数德国法学院学生的困扰,一方面需要掌握法律规范,另一方面还需要学习如何将这些规范运用于“鉴定书式”的框架中。本文旨在说明,制定法及其各单个规范之间存在内部联系,而“鉴定书式”的案例分析练习与认识和强化制定法规范间的内在联系,互有助益。请求权基础的案例分析方法并不会为我们的法律学习与法学教育平添负担,相反,它自始即服务于更系统化和更条理化地掌握制定法的规定。以“鉴定书式”框架为导向进行思维,可以学会对制定法中的规范进行重新梳理与排序。更为重要的是,在请求权基础的案例分析过程中,学生将自己发现问题,并且意识到规则体系中的断裂和不足之处。 This is troubling by countless German law school students who, on the one hand, need to master the norms of law and, on the other hand, need to learn how to apply these norms in the framework of “accreditation”. The purpose of this article is to show that there is an inter-relationship between statutory law and its individual norms and that the case-based practice of practice and cognition and the reinforcement of statutory norms are mutually beneficial. The case-based approach to claim fundamentals does not add to the burden of our legal studies and legal education; on the contrary, it serves from time to time in a more systematic and systematic approach to statutory regulation. Based on the frame of “appraisal style”, we can learn to re-sort and sort the norms in the formulation of laws. More importantly, during the case-based analysis of the basis of the claims, students will discover the problems themselves and be aware of the gaps and deficiencies in the rules system.