最近,我们查阅了一批刑事案件审判卷宗,发现其中合议庭笔录记得敷衍了草。如:“审判长:根据被告的犯罪事实和法律,我的意见判五年有期徒刑。”而后两位陪审员表示同意,签名。又如:“审判长:大伙看给他来几年?陪审员:来它三年吧。”以下又是签名。这些做法是极其不严肃的。 Recently, we reviewed a number of trial cases in criminal cases and found that the transcripts of the collegiate bench were perfunctory. Such as: “presiding judge: According to the defendant’s criminal facts and laws, my opinion sentenced to five years in prison.” And then the two jurors agreed to sign. Another example: “Presiding Judge: Everyone to see him a few years? Jurors: Come it for three years.” And the following is a signature. These practices are extremely unscrupulous.