“现实主义传统”的恢复是“新时期文学”最初阶段最重要的特征,“主流”批评话语自觉地将“现实主义的恢复”与“十七年”乃至整个革命文艺的现实主义传统联系起来,从而把“现实主义的恢复与发展”看作是整个革命文艺传统,特别是“十七年”文艺传统的继承和延续。但在持启蒙立场的批评家看来,“现实主义”的恢复是对“五四”启蒙思想传统的肯定,这就导致了两种倾向不可避免地发生龃牾和碰撞。在“主流”批评的引导下,不同类型的作品因其题材不同,评价“等级”就产生了不同,而“典型性”和“真实性”也成为重要的等级化评价尺度。 The restoration of “realist tradition” is the most important feature in the initial stage of “New Period Literature”, and the “mainstream” criticism discourse consciously converts “the restoration of realism” and “seventeen years” And even the realist tradition of revolutionary literature and art as a whole, and thus view the “restoration and development of realism” as the inheritance and continuation of the entire revolutionary literary tradition, especially the “seventeen years” literary tradition. However, critics who hold the position of enlightenment think that the restoration of “realism” is the affirmation of the tradition of the enlightenment thought of the May Fourth Movement, which has led to the inevitable clash and clash of the two tendencies. Under the guidance of “mainstream ” criticism, different types of works are different because of their different subject matter, evaluation “level ” is different, and “typical ” and “authenticity ” has also become an important level Evaluation of the scale.