过去,我们的政治性管理曾 经是积极的、有效的,但曾 几何时,它失去了原有的光辉。改革开放以后,以经济为主要手段的管理提高了效率,但时至今日,它似乎也不那么“灵验”了,以至于我们重新发现,人作为以“自由”为取向的生物,并不总是孜孜于眼前的物质利益,他还要有一点精神、一点主体性、一点自我提升的需要。 “消极”管理,指那种对于被管理者来说是被迫服从的管理,由于这种管理并不能充分地调动人的积极性,不利于人的持续发展,所以从长远结果看,它不是有效的。所谓的“积极”管理,指的是被管理者乐意接受并使其能力得到主动发挥的管理,由于这种管理有利于人的持续发展,所以从最终结果看,它是颇为有效的。 一种应运而生的新型管理模式,在开始阶段总是呈现为积极有效的性状,但是随着时间的推移、条件的变化,这种管理模式固有的局限性就会暴露出来,变得束缚人的手脚,压抑人的积极性。所以,从历史的角度看,“消极”管理和“积极”管理总是相 In the past, our political management was once active and effective, but it lost its original glory. Since the reform and opening up, economic-based management has improved its efficiency, but so far it does not seem to be so “hands-on” that we rediscover that people as creatures that are “free” are not always Is diligently in the immediate material interests, he also has a little spirit, a little subjectivity, a little self-improvement needs. Negative management refers to the kind of management that is forced to be obeyed by managers. Since such management does not fully mobilize people’s enthusiasm and is not conducive to the sustainable development of mankind, it is not effective in the long run of. The so-called “active” management refers to the management that managers are willing to accept and make their capabilities take the initiative to play. Since this management is conducive to the sustainable development of mankind, it is quite effective from the end result. A new management model emerged at the historic moment, always showing positive and effective traits in the beginning, but with the passage of time and the change of conditions, the inherent limitations of this management mode are exposed and become bound up The hands and feet, to suppress the enthusiasm of the people. Therefore, from a historical perspective, “negative” management and “positive” management are always the same