论文部分内容阅读
此文引用了帝国主义时期沙俄政府关于西藏问题的许多秘密外交文书。这些外交历史文件对于研究沙俄侵略西藏问题很有参考价值。不过,作者对西藏历史的叙述,多处是极其错误的。例如,作者把西藏同中国分割开来,把中国说成是西藏的“历史上的宗主国”;把中国中央政府同西藏地方的统辖关系说成是什么“保护关系”,而且是从十八世纪中叶起建立的这种关系;把西藏说成是一个“国家”等,不一而足。这些说法根本违背了西藏历史的客观发展,是西方帝国主义观点的反映。
This article cites many secret diplomatic instruments of the tsarist Russia government on Tibet during the imperialist period. These diplomatic historical documents have great reference value for studying the issue of tsarist Russia aggression against Tibet. However, the author’s description of Tibet’s history is extremely wrong. For example, the author divides Tibet from China and calls China a “historical sovereign state” in Tibet. What does it mean to describe the governing relationship between the Chinese central government and the Tibetan areas as a “protectionist relationship,” and from the eighteenth century This relationship has been established since the middle of the Middle Ages. He has said that Tibet is a “state” and so on. These statements simply violate the objective development of Tibet’s history and are a reflection of Western imperialist views.