论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价门诊经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影及冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性及可行性。方法:门诊经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者117例,并与同期住院患者相比较。结果:与住院患者相比,门诊组年龄低[(50±5.8)岁,(68±7.2)岁,P<0.05],平均住院日少[(2±0.6)d,(14±5.6)d,P<0.05],并发症没有增加,且无死亡。结论:门诊经桡动脉行冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠脉介入诊疗技术成熟的医院是安全可行的。
Objective: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of out-patient radial artery coronary angiography and coronary intervention. Methods: 117 patients undergoing radial artery coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the outpatient department were compared with inpatients in the same period. Results: Compared with hospitalized patients, the average age at hospital stay was significantly lower in the outpatient group [(50 ± 5.8) years, (68 ± 7.2) years, P <0.05], mean length of stay (2 ± 0.6) days, (14 ± 5.6) days , P <0.05], complications did not increase, and no death. Conclusions: It is safe and feasible for outpatients to undergo coronary artery angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients undergoing coronary intervention.