论文部分内容阅读
非法言词证据无法排除从而导致冤假错案已经成为困扰我国司法机关的一大难题。近期由“两高三部”出台的《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》,以非法证据排除作为主要内容,并且就排除中的证明责任分配进行了规定。本文从检察官证明责任的基本原理出发,阐述检察官应当承担非法言词证据排除中的证明责任,而被告人不应当承担证明责任的观点,并且对证明责任的履行和证明标准进行论述。
The unjust evidence that can not be excluded leads to the unjust and false case has become a major problem plaguing our judiciary. Recently issued by the “two highs and three” “on the handling of criminal cases to rule out a number of issues of illegal evidence,” the exclusion of illegal evidence as the main content, and the exclusion of the burden of proof provisions. Based on the basic principle of prosecutor ’s burden of proof, this article states that prosecutors should bear the burden of proof in the exclusion of evidence of illegal words, while the defendant should not assume the burden of proof, and also discusses the performance of burden of proof and the standard of proof.