论文部分内容阅读
法律界定的不同,是不同法学流派展开其作业、并呈现给世人以不同法律知识和法学理论的逻辑前提。法人类学虽然是崇尚经验和事实描述的学术流派,但它并不排斥对法律概念的关注——因为法律的事实描述不能自动回答什么是法律的问题。不仅如此,法人类学发展史上的一些大师对法律在各自立场都做出了符合人类学命意的解释。法人类学视角的法,可二分为两个观察视角,在静态的视角上,它体现为接受、规范、拘束和可诉四方面;在动态的视角上,它又体现为地域、文化、多元和流变四方面。
The difference of legal definition is that different jurisprudence schools start their homework and present to the world the logical premise of different legal knowledge and legal theory. Although anthropological anthropology is an academic school that advocates experience and factual description, it does not exclude the concern for the concept of law - because the factual description of law does not automatically answer what is a matter of law. Moreover, some great masters in the history of the development of legal anthropology have interpreted the law in their respective positions in accordance with anthropological meanings. The law-anthropological perspective can be divided into two observation perspectives. From a static perspective, it manifests itself in four aspects: acceptance, regulation, restraint and prosecution. From a dynamic perspective, it is also embodied as geographical, cultural and diverse And rheological four aspects.