非遗是否商业化取决于非遗自身的传承规律文化月刊:有人认为商业化对非遗的破坏是明显的。所以,他们认为自从被评为国家级非物质文化遗产传承人之日起,就不应该再从事商业性经营。这种说法您认同吗?苑利:与保护文物一样,要想通过单纯性保护来保护非物质文化遗产,事实上是很难的。单纯保护不但会缺乏必要的资金上的支持,客观上也很难使非遗所具有的诸多价值得到充分展现。因此,多数国家都在不影响非遗正常传承的前提下,对历史上“走市场”的非遗项目尽可能实行商业性经营。这样做不但可以增加就业,拉动一方经济,同时还可以实现利用遗产保存历史,教 Whether or not non-commercial commercialization depends on its own inheritance Law Monthly: Some people think that commercial destruction of non-heritage is obvious. Therefore, they think they should no longer engage in commercial operation since they were appraised as the successors of the national intangible cultural heritage. Do you agree with this statement? Yuan Li: Like protecting cultural relics, it is actually very difficult to protect the intangible cultural heritage through simple protection. Purely protection will not only lack the necessary financial support, objectively it is also very difficult to make a lot of non-preserved value has been fully demonstrated. Therefore, on the premise of not affecting the normal inheritance of non-Chinese heritage, most countries carry out commercial management on non-legacy items in history that are “walking the market” as far as possible. This will not only increase employment, stimulate one side of the economy, but also make it possible to preserve the history of the heritage