随着经济社会的发展,专业性强、与行政管理活动密切相关的民事纠纷层出不穷,传统的审判方式显得力不从心,司法资源的有限性进一步凸显。基于对司法中心主义的反思及司法危机的倒逼,西方法治发达国家有针对性地发展多元化纠纷解决机制。美国、英国、日本等国的司法实践证明,行政裁决作为一种行之有效的替代性纠纷解决方式,能够有效地弥补司法资源的不足,缓解、分担审判机关的压力,降低纠纷解决的成本,及时调整社会关系。2014年10月,中共中央十八届四中全会作出的《关于全面推进依法治国若 With the development of economy and society, the professionalism is strong, and civil disputes closely related to administrative activities are endless. The traditional methods of trial appear to be inadequate and the limited resources of judicial resources are further highlighted. Based on the reflection of judicial centrism and the judicial crisis, the developed countries in Western countries have targeted to diversify their dispute resolution mechanisms. Judicial practice in the United States, Britain, Japan and other countries proves that administrative adjudication, as an effective solution to alternative dispute resolution, can effectively make up for the shortage of judicial resources, ease and share the pressure of judicial organs and reduce the cost of dispute resolution, Adjust social relations in time. In October 2014, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China