除了以红头文件的形式指导法律的实施显然不妥之外,河北省“一号文件”最为人诟病的有如下两点: 一是显失公平。“为富”就可以“不仁”吗,对别的人可否照此办理?二是易形成犯罪预期和犯罪激励。既然以前犯下的“前科”现在可以被“赦免”,是不是意味着现在见不得光的一些问题随着时间的推移和政策环境的变化,也能获得同样的“待遇”? 这些问题,“一号文件”的制定者不会考虑不到,相信他们也经过了一番利弊的权衡。考虑到“孙大午案”的影响,他们“矫枉过正”的苦衷是可以理解的。 Apart from guiding the implementation of laws in the form of red-headed documents, it is obviously inappropriate that the “one document” in Hebei Province has the most criticisms as follows: First, it is obviously unfair. “Wealth” can be “benevolent” it, as other people can handle this? Second, easy to form criminal expectations and crime incentives. Since the “criminal record” previously committed can now be “forgiven”, does it mean that some issues that now can not be dealt with now receive the same “treatment” as time passes and the changes in the policy environment? These questions, “One No. file ”formulators will not be considered, I believe they have also been a trade-off between pros and cons. Taking into account the “Sun Dawu case,” their “overkill” difficulties are understandable.