因果关系是侵权责任成立的必备要件之一,但其在理论和实务中又是一个扰人的问题。在我国必要因果关系说在很长一段时间内处于通说地位,法官在判案中对于因果关系往往一带而过,或用过错等直接代替因果关系的判断。本文主要论述我国侵权法上因果关系理论以及实务的现状和存在问题。 Causality is one of the necessary requirements for the establishment of tort liability, but it is also a disturbing issue in theory and practice. In our country, it is necessary to say that the causal relationship is in a very long time. The judge judges whether the causal relationship is often passed in the judgment case, or whether the causal relationship is directly replaced by fault. This article mainly discusses the theory of causation in tort law and the status quo and existing problems in practice.