论文部分内容阅读
采用历史学、社会学、民俗学、宗教学等多学科的研究方法,对清廷火烧少林寺一说重新进行探讨,认为:清廷并未火烧北少林寺即河南嵩山少林寺,也没有火烧福建南少林寺(福清少林寺、泉州少林寺、莆田少林寺)。“火烧少林寺”传说缘起于明清鼎革、民族矛盾尖锐的特殊历史时期,与众多历史事件有关,是反清组织借用附会少林盛名,制造反清舆论,为达到反清复明目的而产生的。
Using the multidisciplinary research methods of history, sociology, folklore, religion and so on, this article revisits the theory of fire burning Shaolin Temple in the Qing dynasty. It holds that the Qing dynasty did not fire the northern Shaolin Temple, ie, the Songshan Shaolin Temple in Henan Province, nor the southern Shaolin Temple (Fuqing Shaolin Temple, Quanzhou Shaolin Temple, Putian Shaolin Temple). “Fire Shaolin Temple ” legend originated in the Ming and Qing Dynasties Ding leather, ethnic conflicts sharp special period of history, and many historical events, is the anti-Qing organization borrowed the appendix Shaomin famous to create anti-Qing public opinion, in order to achieve the purpose of anti-Chinglish of.