论文部分内容阅读
自郭平英状告陈明远盗用郭沫若名义出版《新潮》并著文揭露陈明远伪造郭沫若书信之后,北京海淀区法院受理此案并于今年年初作出判决:一、《新潮》一书停止再版;二、被告陈明远向郭沫若继承人郭平英等公开赔礼道歉,消除影响;三、被告向原告赔偿经济损失。一审判决后,陈明远向北京市第一中级人民法院提出上诉。几乎在通过法律解决问题的同时,双方在报刊上还进行着一场笔墨官司。在这一过程中,陈明远始终未用他本人的名义答辩,这当然不是说,陈不想为维护自己的名誉而战。
Since the case of Guo Pingying suing Chen Mingyuan for misappropriating Guo Moruo’s book “Trendy” and exposing Chen Mingyuan’s forgery of Guo Moruo’s letter, the court in Beijing’s Haidian District accepted the case and handed down the verdict earlier this year: 1. The book “Trendy” ceases to be republished. 2. The defendant Chen Mingyuan Apologize to Guo Moruo’s successor, Guo Pingying, and other public officials to eliminate the impact; and (3) the defendant compensated the plaintiff for economic losses. After the judgment of the first instance, Chen Mingyuan appealed to the Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court. Almost by the law to solve the problem at the same time, the two sides also carried out a press in the press lawsuit. In the process, Chen Mingyuan never defended himself in his own name, which certainly does not mean that Chen did not want to fight for his own honor.