论文部分内容阅读
2012年的刑诉法修正案正式规定了技术侦查措施能被检察机关使用,但是其实施权却在公安机关。而在实践中公安机关实施技术侦查措施却不能发挥其应有的作用,面对法律规定与现实之间的矛盾,本文将探讨检察机关实施技术侦查措施的可能性与必要性,特别是其正当性应如何在法律层面上体现,如何寻求其有效性和合法性的平衡,试从职务犯罪中的技术侦查手段入手,对检察机关运用技术侦查的正当性进行探讨。
The 2012 amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law formally stipulates that the technology investigation measures can be used by the prosecutorial agencies, but the enforcement power is in the public security organs. However, in practice, the public security organs can not play their due role in the implementation of technical investigation measures. In the face of the contradiction between legal provisions and reality, this article will explore the possibility and necessity of procuratorial organs implementing technical investigation measures, How should sexuality be reflected in the legal level? How to seek the balance between its validity and legitimacy? Trying to start with the technical means of investigation in job-related crimes, and discussing the justification of employing prosecutors for technical investigation.