论文部分内容阅读
期中考试后,读一年级的儿子磨磨蹭蹭地将语文试卷拿出来让我签字,说考得不好。我一看,两道看图写作题均被老师打红“×”。第一题,儿子对画面上正在给小树苗浇水的男孩写道:“哥哥在种树”,老师更正为“哥哥在浇水”。第二题,画面上是大片成熟的麦子和两个正在捉蝴蝶的小孩。儿子写道:“庄稼丰收了”。结果又是错,题下更正为“小朋友捉蝴蝶”。儿子对我说:“老师讲,她说的是标准答案。”在儿子眼里,老师是绝对正确的。我并不在乎儿子这一次的考试成绩,但教师的一个标准答案,使儿子原本正确的思维方式被否定,儿子就有可能没有勇气再展开思维。由于老师的绝对权威,使儿子的思维
After the mid-term exam, the first-grade son would rub his face off the Chinese test paper to sign it, saying it was not good. I saw that the two drawing writing questions were hit by the teacher red “×”. On the first question, my son wrote to the boy on the screen who is pouring young saplings: “My brother is planting trees,” and the teacher corrects him as “his brother is watering.” The second question, the picture is a large mature wheat and two are catching butterfly children. Son wrote: “The crop has bumper.” The result is wrong, corrected as “children catch the butterfly.” The son said to me: “The teacher said she said the standard answer.” In the eyes of his son, the teacher is absolutely correct. I do not care about my son’s test scores this time, but a standard answer by his teacher has denied the son’s right way of thinking and his son may not have the courage to start thinking again. Due to the teacher’s absolute authority, make son’s thinking