论文部分内容阅读
在专利审查中,创造性判断比新颖性判断更为困难,因它包含了专利审查员的主观性因素。不少优秀的发明总是具有巨大随机和抽象性质,很多时候是不能用一般的逻辑思维来衡量。在现实当中,也有不少优秀的发明申请,因不具有创造性,而不授予专利权。认知心理学的问题解决便是研究有关于人类如何解决问题的学科。因此,两者很可能是具有相关性的,也许,通过认知心理学的观点和思维,能有助于提高创造性审查的准确性。
In the patent examination, the creative judgment is more difficult than the novelty judgment because it includes the subjective factors of the patent examiner. Many excellent inventions always have a great randomness and abstract nature, and many times they can not be measured by general logical thinking. In reality, there are quite a few excellent applications for invention because they are not creative and do not grant patent rights. The solution to the problem of cognitive psychology is to study the discipline of how human beings solve the problem. Therefore, the two are likely to be related, perhaps, through the cognitive psychology perspectives and thinking can help to improve the accuracy of the creative review.