记得一位评论家说过:批评即是苛求,听多了对《大决战·平津战役》的赞扬颂美之词,蓦然想起这句话,倒起了冷静打量它的不足的诚心。当然,这决不是逆反心理下的吹毛求疵,也不是无事生非的好斗品性。纵观全片,《平津战役》的不足主要表现在两个方面。一是在事件的表述上精选度不够,在人物塑造上重点不够凸出。众所周知,“平津战役”历时一个多月,双方投入兵力达百万之众战线长、战区密集,影片既要尊重一打一和,以打求和的历史事实,又要再现战争双方前后方的斗勇斗智,要想在有限的银幕时空里,比较真实全面地反映整个战役错综复杂的全过程,并赋予事件与人物的典型品格以求艺术的上乘,其难度是可想而知的。唯有在事件的选剪上,在主要人物的塑造上下功走,十能收到以一当十、窥一 I remember one critic who said: Criticism is demanding, listening to more praise for the “Battle of the Great Plains Conflict” sill words, I suddenly remembered these words, upside down the calm look at the lack of sincerity. Of course, this is by no means a fussy reflexive psychology, nor an aggressive temperament. Throughout the whole film, “the Battle of Pingjin” deficiencies mainly in two aspects. First, the presentation of the incident on the selection is not enough, the characters in the focus is not prominent enough. As we all know, the “Pingjin Campaign” lasted for more than a month. Both parties have invested millions of troops in battlefields and dense war zones. Both films must respect the historical facts of seeking one fight while reconciling them with one another, It is very difficult to imagine how difficult it is to find the typical character of events and figures in the limited screen space and time to reflect the whole complex process of the entire battle in a more real and complete manner. Only in the event of election cut, in the main character of the building from top to bottom, ten can receive the top ten, peep