论文部分内容阅读
目的了解怀柔区2007年至2013年人群出生缺陷监测与医院出生缺陷监测的异同,以便更好的为出生缺陷监测工作的模式提供科学依据。方法对怀柔区2007年至2011年居住在怀柔区人群出生缺陷与医院出生缺陷的资料进行对比、分析。结果 2007年至2011年人群出生缺陷共监测围产儿14 298例,出生缺陷328例,人群出生缺陷发生率为22.94‰;医院出生缺陷共监测围产儿15 326例,出生缺陷321例,出生缺陷发生率为20.94‰。人群出生缺陷发生率略高于医院出生缺陷发生率。人群出生缺陷与医院出生缺陷顺位前五位基本相同,发生率较相近。产后8天至42天发现的出生缺陷情况比较人群监测检出数少于医院监测检出例数。结论继续做好医院监测和人群监测,发挥各自优势,同时不断完善1岁以内出生缺陷监测工作。
Objective To understand the similarities and differences between monitoring of birth defects and hospital birth defects in Huairou district from 2007 to 2013 in order to provide a scientific basis for the monitoring of birth defects. Methods The data of birth defects and birth defects in Huairou district from 2007 to 2011 in Huairou district were compared and analyzed. Results A total of 14 298 perinatal birth defects and 328 birth defects were observed during 2007-2011. The incidence of birth defects in the population was 22.94 ‰. Birth defects in hospitals were monitored by 15 326 perinatal births, 321 birth defects and birth defects Rate of 20.94 ‰. The incidence of birth defects in the population is slightly higher than the incidence of birth defects in hospitals. Birth defects and hospital birth defects rankings of the top five are basically the same, the incidence is similar. Birth defects detected in 8 days to 42 days postpartum were less than those detected in hospital surveillance. Conclusions The hospital monitoring and crowd monitoring should be continued to exert their respective advantages while constantly improving the monitoring of birth defects within 1 year of age.