语文教学中经常会碰到这样一种情况,即某些概念、文本词句的解释并非唯一,甚至是对立的,我们称之为多解性言语。无论高等教育还是基础教育界,教师面对这种多解性言语往往难以取舍,便告诉学生两种或多种解释都是成立的。当然,这种将矛盾交给学生自己去处理的方法未尝不可,但作为教师来说,一定得从教学的角度作出更可靠的解释。例如,《木兰诗》中关于“雄兔脚扑朔,雌兔眼迷离”是否互文的争论便是一例。毫无疑问,《木兰诗》是中国文学史上使用互文最多的经 Chinese language teaching often encounters a situation in which the interpretation of certain concepts and textual expressions is not unique or even antagonistic. We call this multi-solution language. Regardless of higher education or basic education, teachers are often faced with this kind of ambiguous speech and tell students that two or more explanations are valid. Of course, this method of handing the contradictions to the students themselves is not a bad idea, but as a teacher, we must make a more reliable explanation from the teaching point of view. For example, the controversy in the “Mulan poetry” about whether “the male rabbit’s foot flaps” and whether the female rabbit’s eyes are blurred is an example. There is no doubt that “The Poems of Mulan” is the most used intertextual in the history of Chinese literature.