论文部分内容阅读
不断累积的证据断定:规范化胸外心肺复苏(CPR)至多只能对生命器官给予灌注,时间一长,情况即行恶化。因此目前正在找寻更有效的CPR方法。本文介绍262例—开始就有昏迷但最终仍能存活的心跳骤停病人的一年后随访结果,分析心跳骤停时间和CPR时间之际的相互关系及其对神经系功能恢复的影响。
Accumulating evidence concludes that normalized cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can at best give perfusion to vital organs over time, worsening the condition. So now is looking for more effective CPR method. This article presents the results of one year follow-up of 262 patients-initially cardiac arrest patients who were unconscious but ultimately viable-and analyzed the relationship between cardiac arrest time and CPR time and its effect on neurological functional recovery.