论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨期刊零被引率与期刊关键评价指标的相关关系,检验期刊零被引率作为期刊评价反向指标的科学性。【方法】以CSSCI为数据源,选择图书情报学科核心期刊作为研究对象,计算时间窗口分别为2-5年的期刊零被引率、期刊关键评价指标,借助于SPSS分析期刊零被引率与期刊评价指标间的相关关系。【结果】期刊零被引率与期刊关键评价指标(2年影响因子、5年影响因子和h指数)显著负相关,期刊自引对于期刊的引用突破并不构成重要影响。【结论】期刊零被引率可以作为一个反向指标,但需要考虑学科差异性。
【Objective】 The objective of this study is to explore the correlation between zero cited rate of journals and critical evaluation indexes of journals and to test the zero cited rate of journals as a scientific indicator of reverse evaluation of journals. 【Method】 With CSSCI as the data source, the core journals of library and information science were selected as the research object. The zero-time journals of time period of 2-5 years were calculated, and the key evaluation indexes of journals were calculated. Correlation between indicators. 【Result】 The results showed that there was a significant negative correlation between the zero rejection rate of journals and the key evaluation indexes of journals (2-year impact factor, 5-year impact factor and h-index). Journal self-citation did not constitute a significant impact on journals. 【Conclusions】 The journals zero rejection rate can be used as a reverse indicator, but the disciplinary differences need to be considered.