论文部分内容阅读
诚如王评章所评,于平属于不多见的“领导型的学者与学者型的领导”。于文①(“大数据”一文简称,下同)中,对于当前艺术学理论研究存在问题及其出路作出了高屋建瓴的分析,读来令笔者有豁然之感。于文逻辑绵密条分缕析地论述了,在艺术学研究中作为存量的、共性的基础研究,与作为增量的、特殊性的对策(应用、现状)研究之间出现了不能互相支援的脱节现象。而这种缺失,正是缘于二者都无法进入一种更高水平的学理建构层面。具体表现为:艺术学所特有的“实践性”因此无法上升
As Wang Pingzhang has commented, Yu Ping belongs to a rare “leading scholar and scholarly leader.” In Wen ① ( “big data ” a text abbreviation, the same below), for the current art theory research problems and their solutions to the high house built analysis, read so I suddenly feeling. In the paper, the paper discusses in detail the disconnection phenomena that can not be mutually supportive between the common basic research as the stock and the research as the incremental and the special countermeasure (application, status quo). And this lack of precisely because of the two are unable to enter a higher level of theoretical construction level. The concrete manifestation is that the unique “practicality” of art can not rise