传统学理上对请求权与债权的关系,主要有债权说、效力说或权能说以及独立权利说或救济权说等。请求权是实现或救济债权的一种手段,其与债权有着紧密的联系,但其与债权并非同一概念,二者各自有着不同的本质内涵和适用外延。两者分别是从不同的角度、不同的标准对权利进行分类的结果。在整个民事权利体系中,请求权是与债权相区别的一种独立的民事权利。 The traditional theory of the relationship between claims and claims, the main claims that the effectiveness of said or power to say and the right to say independent or relief and so on. The right to claim is a means to realize or relieve the claim, which is closely related to the claim, but it is not the same concept as the claim. Both of them have different essential connotation and applicable extension. The two are respectively the result of classifying rights from different perspectives and different standards. In the whole system of civil rights, the right of claim is an independent civil right that is different from the creditor’s right.