论文部分内容阅读
汉语规范化是一个老话题。那么,为什么现在还要来议论这个题目呢?这是因为:对于汉语规范化的重要性和必要性,在语言学界内的认识虽然比较一致,但在其他战线和部门,人们的认识往往是见仁见智、大相径庭的。 比如1978年8月24日,《人民日报》发表了《语言是活的东西》一文,认为“在社会上切不可搞什么‘语言规范化’(这与推广普通话是两码事),否则就要限制语言的发展,使之僵化”,文章还说:“常常有这样的情况,好些善于使用‘不规范’的乡言土语的作者所写的小说、文章,却显得生动,使人感到亲切,而用‘规范’语言堆砌出来的东西,则往往给人一种干巴巴的感觉。”这篇文章所表述的观点在现实生活中有一定的代表性。这说明还有不少人对干什么是
The standardization of Chinese is an old topic. Why, then, is it still necessary to discuss this topic now? This is because: Regarding the importance and necessity of the standardization of Chinese, although the understanding in the field of linguistics is relatively uniform, in other fronts and departments, people’s understanding is often a matter of opinion, Very different. For example, on August 24, 1978, the People’s Daily published the article “Language is a living thing.” It was held that “in society, we must not engage in any “standardization of language” (this is the same as promoting Putonghua), otherwise we must limit the language. “The development has made it rigid.” The article also said: "This is often the case. Many novels and articles written by authors who are good at using non-standard native dialects are vivid and affectionate. The stuff that ’standardizes’ language piles up gives people a sense of dryness.” The views expressed in this article are representative of real life. This shows that many people still do