论文部分内容阅读
在翻译理论不断发展的历史中,无论是哪一时期的学者对翻译的认知都从未脱离过“忠实”二字,而大多数译者也将“忠实”视为自身翻译行为的衡量标准。但是,由法国文艺社会学家埃斯卡皮(Robert Escarpit)提出翻译中存在的“翻译的创造性叛逆”现象,则似乎与此恰恰相反。笔者在对此问题研究的过程中,尝试从翻译主体的角度出发,通过引证举例,说明“忠实”原则与“创造性叛逆”两者并不是对立的,甚至从一定程度上来说,后者是前者更深层次的展现。
In the ever-evolving history of translation theory, most scholars also regard “faithfulness” as their own translator A measure of behavior. However, the “creative treason of translation” that exists in the translation proposed by the French literary sociologist Robert Escarpit seems to be the opposite. In the process of the research on this issue, the author tries to illustrate the principle of “faithfulness” and “creative rebellion” by quoting an example from the perspective of translation, and even to a certain extent, The latter is a deeper manifestation of the former.