论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查一定量的中药处方,将这些中药处方中最常用的50种中药材的剂量与中国药典所规定的剂量相比较看是否相符,分析临床用药的灵活性,提高中药材的合理用药水平。方法:查阅处方1000张,统计出最常用的50种中药材并进行分析,包括出现频率的高低以及用量的多少,根据中国药典规定的用量范围进行比较,看是否与中国药典所规定的剂量范围符合。结果:在处方中出现频率前50位中有大量中药材存在与中国药典所规定的用量不符合的情况,普遍偏高。结论:中国药典的规定对很多基层医院或诊所在实际的应用过程中不具有实际的约束意义,并不完全适合临床使用,有待完善。
Objective: To investigate a certain amount of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, the most commonly used Chinese medicine prescriptions of 50 kinds of Chinese herbal medicine dose and Chinese Pharmacopoeia dosages compared to see whether the match, analysis of clinical medication flexibility and improve the rational use of Chinese herbal medicine . Methods: 1000 prescriptions were surveyed, the most commonly used 50 kinds of Chinese herbal medicines were counted and analyzed, including the frequency of occurrence and the amount of usage. According to the dosage range stipulated in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, we compared with the Chinese Pharmacopoeia dosage range meets the. Results: There was a large number of Chinese herbal medicines in the top 50 of the frequency of prescription, which was inconsistent with the dosage prescribed by Chinese Pharmacopoeia. It was generally high. Conclusion: The provisions of Chinese Pharmacopoeia do not have practical restraint significance for many practical applications of primary hospitals or clinics, and are not completely suitable for clinical use and need to be perfected.