论文部分内容阅读
案情: 原告人:柳万春,男,46岁,系农民。原告人:刘富宝,男,52岁,系县农行干部。原告人:孙天贵,男,37岁,系该乡干部。被告人:××市第二工程公司。法定代表人:贺天喜,系该公司经理。 1988年4月16日,被告承担了拆除某乡政府大院烟囱任务。由于环境所限,被告决定采用爆破拆除方法,但是在爆炸时,烟囱下部均按设计要求从上至下倒塌,但上部则向左倾倒,致使邻院的五间平房被砸毁,原告等人诉至人民法院要求赔偿损失。经人民法院审理查明,被告具有运用爆破拆除方法的技术力量,而且也在其它工程上取的了成功。同时对施工中的打眼、装药、药量等做了测算鉴定,均符合技术指标和要求,工程人员现场指挥也无失误,认定被告没有
Case: Plaintiff: Liu Wanchun, male, 46 years old, is a farmer. Plaintiff: Liu Fu Bao, male, 52 years old, Department of Agricultural Bank of China cadres. Plaintiff: Sun Tiangui, male, 37 years old, is the township cadre. Defendant: XX City Second Engineering Company. Legal representative: He Tianxi, the company manager. April 16, 1988, the defendant assumed the demolition of a township government compound chimney task. Due to the environmental constraints, the defendant decided to adopt the blasting method. However, at the time of the explosion, the lower part of the chimney collapsed from top to bottom according to the design requirements. However, the upper part of the chimney fell to the left, causing the destruction of five bungalows in the neighborhood. Appeal to the people’s court for damages. Upon examination by the people’s court, the defendant has the technical force to use the blasting demolition method and has also succeeded in other projects. At the same time the construction of the drilling, charge, dosage and other calculations made appraisal, are in line with technical indicators and requirements, engineering personnel on-site command without error, that the defendant did not