论文部分内容阅读
河南各级法院的院长们以后的日子不好过了。2012年9月17日,河南高院发布领导干部问责规定,各级法院出现七种情形,要对院长、庭长进行问责。对涉讼信访处置不力引发集体上访的、执行上级决策不力造成工作失误的,通通在问责范围。更狠的是,法官因故意或重大过失造成错案,院长必须引咎辞职。罚则来势汹汹,让人为之一震。纠错要抓一把手。不过,法院的院长跟一般党政机关的一把手可有不同。院长是法院行政事务的领导者,除了发现
Henan’s courts at all levels after the days are not easy. On September 17, 2012, Henan High Court issued the accountability provisions for leading cadres. There are seven situations at all levels of courts. They should hold accountants and presidents accountable. In case the petitions for petitioning are not handled in an unfriendly way and lead to collective petitions, mistakes made in the implementation of poor decisions made by superiors cause work mistakes to be made in the scope of accountability. Even harder, the judge wrongfully caused a wrong case, the president must resign. Penalties menacing, people startled. Correction to grasp a leader. However, the president of the court may be different from the number one general party and government authority. The dean is the leader of the administrative affairs of the court, except to discover