论文部分内容阅读
“新形势下干部监督工作的实践与探索”征文选题参考范围中有一题:对党政一把手的监督。这使我自然想到了委员会制问题。委员会制,又称会议制、合议制。委员会制作为民主制的一种形式,其本质是对独裁专制的一种否定。委员会是由选举产生,委员会按照集体领导的原则代表民意(多数人意志)作出决定、实施领导。然而在实践中,委员会制却不能够防止家长制和权力集中于个人的现象出现,以至于要研究监督“一把手”的问题,究竟根子何
“Cadre Supervision under the New Situation: Practice and Exploration” There is one question in the reference scope of the essay topics: the supervision of top party and government leaders. This made me naturally think of the commission system. Committee system, also known as the meeting system, collegial system. The Commission’s production as a form of democracy is essentially a denial of dictatorship. The committee is elected. The committee, on the principle of collective leadership, represents the opinion of the majority (the will of the majority) and takes the lead. However, in practice, the commission system can not prevent the phenomenon of patriarchal ownership and the concentration of power on individuals, so that the question of how to supervise the “number one” should be studied.