论文部分内容阅读
“历史叙事功能的退化与史学危机”一文对叙事本位与历史叙事的弘扬非常精彩,稍嫌不足的是对“退化”与“危机”这两个全文立论基础的实证还不够充分。要振兴中国的史学,使史学成果真正经得起时间的考验,关键并不在坚持“史论本位”还是“叙事本位”,而是必须坚持“实事本位”。即不管“论”还是“叙”,都必须树立确保所论所叙之事的真实、翔实与扎实的理念,以在最大程度上确保史学成果的公正、公信与公平。
The article “The Degradation of History Narrative Function and Historiography Crisis” is very brilliant for carrying forward the narrative standard and historical narrative. To some extent, it is not enough to verify the evidence of the two full texts, “Degradation” and “Crisis.” To revitalize China’s historiography so that the achievements of history can truly stand the test of time, the key is not to insist on “historical norms” or “narrative standards”, but must adhere to “factual basis.” In other words, regardless of the “theory” or the “narrative,” we must establish a true, accurate and solid concept of ensuring that what is said in order to ensure the fairness, credibility and fairness of historical achievements to the maximum extent possible.