“文革”结束之后,历史学界对“文革”时期极度教条主义和过度意识形态化思维方式与话语氛围进行清理,恢复了对“文革”前若干重大理论性热点问题的学术讨论。但是,这些探讨在重新达到“文革”前所达到的深度临界点之后难以继续推进,不久趋于沉静。相对于其他领域的快速变革,史学界感受到理论贫乏的危机和研究范式突破的诉求。围绕“史学危机”问题的讨论,中国史学理论形成一个探索的热潮。探讨的范围,不仅涉及对“史学危机”本身的理解,并且包括对20世纪中期以来提出 After the “Cultural Revolution” ended, the historians cleared up extreme dogmatism and over-ideological thinking and discourse atmosphere during the “Cultural Revolution,” and resumed their academic researches on some of the major theoretical hot issues before the “Cultural Revolution.” discuss. However, these discussions are difficult to push forward after they reach the depth critical point reached before the “Cultural Revolution” was reached, and soon they will become quiet. Compared with the rapid change in other fields, historians have felt the crisis of theoretical insufficiency and the demand of breakthrough in research paradigm. Around the discussion of the issue of “historical crisis”, the theory of Chinese historiography has formed an upsurge of exploration. The scope of the discussion involves not only an understanding of the “historiography crisis” itself, but also a reference to the