论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究尿常规检查对诊断尿路感染的价值。方法:选取我院2015年10月-2016年7月期间收治的62例疑似尿路感染的患者作为研究对象,采集患者尿液并行尿常规检测,分析各项指标数值,评价尿常规对于尿路感染的诊断价值。结果:62例行尿常规检查的患者中,有19例(30.64%)患者符合尿路感染的诊断标准;有43例(69.36%)患者不符合尿路感染的诊断标准,尿路感染患者的相关化验指标明显高于未发生尿路感染患者,P<0.05,有统计学意义。62例样本中,有27例(43.5%)样本细菌检测为阳性,有2例(3.2%)样本真菌检测为阳性。27例细菌检测阳性样本中,21例(77.8%)为革兰氏阴性杆菌阳性,23例(85.2%)为大肠埃希菌阳性,3例(11.1%)革兰氏阳性球菌阳性。结论:以尿常规的化验值作为尿路感染诊断的依据,具有快速、准确率高、易操作的特点,能够早期发现症状不明显的尿路感染,为早期治疗提供了依据。
Objective: To explore the value of urinalysis in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Methods: Sixty-two patients with suspected urinary tract infection admitted to our hospital from October 2015 to July 2016 were selected as the research object. Urine was collected and routine urine tests were performed. The indexes of each index were analyzed to evaluate the urinary routine The diagnostic value of infection. Results: Of the 62 routine urine tests, 19 (30.64%) patients met the diagnostic criteria of urinary tract infection; 43 (69.36%) patients did not meet the diagnostic criteria of urinary tract infection, urinary tract infection in patients Relevant laboratory tests were significantly higher than those without urinary tract infection, P <0.05, with statistical significance. Of the 62 samples, 27 (43.5%) samples were positive for bacteria and 2 (3.2%) samples were positive for fungi. Among the 27 bacterial positive samples, 21 (77.8%) were positive for Gram-negative bacilli, 23 (85.2%) were positive for Escherichia coli and 3 (11.1%) were positive for Gram-positive cocci. Conclusion: The urine routine test value as the basis of urinary tract infection diagnosis, with fast, accurate, easy to operate features, early detection of symptoms of urinary tract infection was not obvious, provided the basis for early treatment.