一、人类学决策十字阵视野中的行动法律必须顺乎人的自然本性,并建立在对全体人类同等适用的标准之上。众多法哲学流派对此都给予了肯定。然而,一旦涉及“人性”和“人之自然本性”的详细标准,就会招致其中许多流派的反对。正是在这里,对基本需求的经验式理解,与“理性”和“精神”等高级概念彼此对峙。什么才是人性的真正指针呢?相对主义学派满腹怀疑地指出了众多法律信条的多面性与历史性。程序主义者则仰赖具体化程序,试图走出 I. The law of action in the field of anthropological decision-making cross-shaped array must follow the natural nature of man and be based on the same standards applicable to all human beings. Many jurisprudence schools have given this affirmation. However, when it comes to the detailed criteria of “human nature ” and “human nature ”, many of them will be opposed. It is here that the empirical understanding of basic needs confronts each other with advanced concepts such as “rationality” and “spirit.” What is the real indicator of human nature? The relativistic school has pointedly and suspiciously pointed out the versatility and historic nature of many legal creeds. Programmers are dependent on concrete procedures, trying to get out