论文部分内容阅读
本文是拉图尔就布鲁尔的批评(参见本刊今年第3期)作出的回应。他强调科学实践是主客体区分不发生作用的唯一领域,并反驳了布鲁尔对他混淆了自然与关于自然的信念或说明之间的区别的批评,指出这种区别仿佛是割断本想连接在一起的东西,即在原本为一个整体的树干中插入楔子,然后再把它们粘合起来,从而给联系制造了麻烦,而这也就是现代主义哲学难题的根源所在。拉图尔认为,布鲁尔等人没有资格对科学作出评价,他的强纲领已经变成了科学元研究的一个障碍。
This article is Latour’s response to Brewer’s criticism (see issue 3 of this issue). He emphasizes that scientific practice is the only area where the division of subject and object does not work and refutes Brewer’s criticism of his confusion of the distinction between nature and the belief or description of nature that such a distinction seems to be a matter of severing It is the root cause of the philosophical problems of modernism that together things, that is, inserting wedges into the trunk as a whole, and then gluing them together, creating problems in connection. Latour believes that Brewer et al. Are not qualified to evaluate science, and his strong program has become an obstacle to the study of science.