我们一直讲社会主义初级阶段是建立在生产力不发达的基础之上，现在我们的问题是这个“不发达”它的量的规定性该怎么说。我想这个问题不应该用人均 GNP或者 GDP是多少的数字来回答，而是要用“生产力的性质”来回答。但是“生产力的性质”又该怎么规定呢 ?这个问题又不好回 We have always said that the primary stage of socialism is based on the underdevelopment of the productive forces. Our question now is how to define the quantity of this “underdeveloped” economy. I do not think this question should be answered in terms of the number of GNP per capita or GDP, but rather the question of “the nature of the productive forces.” But what about the “nature of the productive forces”? This problem is not good enough