论文部分内容阅读
1999年9月4日,深圳罗湖区法院开庭审理市民金女士状告市公安局行政不作为一案。法院当庭宣判:市公安局的行为已构成行政不作为,应确认违法。金女士在其起诉书中称,她因举报其所在单位负责人贪污腐化问题遭到了一系列打击报复:1996年5月3日遭入室砸抢,1998年3月11日被殴打致伤。事发当天,她向南园、南华派出所报案,但直到次年3月,两家派出所才向其做出不予受理的书面答复。金女士遂向福田公安分局申请行政复议,但遭拒绝。1999年5月12日,金女士又向市公安局提交复议申请,该局收下了申请书并承诺5日答复。然而两个月过去了,仍未得到任何消息的金女士一纸诉状告上法庭,请求法院确认市公安局“故意违反法定职责、无
On September 4, 1999, Ms. Luo Jinming, a member of the court of Shenzhen Luohu District Court, sued the public security bureau for administrative omission. The court sentenced in court: the behavior of the Municipal Public Security Bureau has constituted an administrative omission, should confirm the illegal. Ms. Kim claimed in her indictment that she was hit in a series of retaliations by reporting the corruption of the unit in charge of her unit: smashed on the ground on 3 May 1996 and wounded on 11 March 1998. The day of the incident, she reported to South Park, South China police station, but until March the following year, the two police stations to make a written reply to them inadmissible. Ms. Jin then applied for administrative reconsideration to Futian Public Security Bureau, but was rejected. On May 12, 1999, Ms. Jin submitted an application for reconsideration to the Municipal Public Security Bureau. The council accepted the application and promised a reply on the 5th. However, Ms. Jin, who passed two months and still has not got any information, sued the court in a paper petition and asked the court to confirm that the Municipal Public Security Bureau ”intentionally violated the statutory duties and no