论文部分内容阅读
目的了解不同健康教育方式对农村居民艾滋病认知状况远期效果影响,为今后开展艾滋病健康教育工作提供科学依据。方法对随机抽取3个项目县农村居民以不同的方式进行艾滋病相关知识的健康教育,并通过灰色最优聚类对不同方式前后两次调查项目知晓率改变情况进行归类。结果3个项目县两次调查结果表明各调查项目知晓率有升有降,前后比较部分项目有统计学意义;未进行干预的县和采用发放宣传材料干预的县远期影响效果较差,专家集中讲座的方式远期效果为一般,优劣顺序为:专家集中讲座、发放宣传材料、未进行干预。结论健康教育能够提高居民的知晓水平,集中讲座优于发放宣传材料,但无论何种方式其远期效果较差,需要经常反复才能获得较好效果。
Objective To understand the long-term effects of different health education methods on HIV / AIDS awareness of rural residents and provide scientific basis for AIDS health education in the future. Methods The health education of HIV / AIDS-related knowledge was conducted in three different ways randomly by rural residents in three project counties. The gray optimal clustering was used to classify the awareness rate of the two survey items in different ways. Results The results of two surveys in three project counties showed that the awareness rate of each survey item increased or decreased, and some of the items before and after the comparison were statistically significant. The counties without intervention and the counties with the intervention of dissemination materials had a poorer long-term impact, and experts The long-term effect of centralized lectures is general, and the order of advantages and disadvantages is that experts focus on lectures, distribute propaganda materials and do not intervene. Conclusion Health education can improve the level of residents’ awareness, focusing on lectures is better than the distribution of promotional materials, but no matter what its long-term effect is poor, you need to repeatedly get better results.