论文部分内容阅读
一直以来,首都文化研究有两种基本视角,一种是以城市文化视角进行研究;另一种是以城市-乡村共生体文化视角进行研究。而沿着这两种不同视角,研究者们对首都文化的概念与内涵界定以及首都文化未来发展功能产生分歧。而这种分歧的焦点是首都文化功能未来发展是以高速的城市信息化、现代化为基础,还是构建人与自然和谐的文化为基础。尽管相关文献已经提供丰富的理论源泉,值得注意的是,对于首都文化以城市-乡村共生体的文化视角并不占主流,但它却打破了以城市文化解释首都文化的单一模式,这为首都文化的深化研究提供了理论资源。
All along, there are two basic perspectives for the study of capital culture, one is from the perspective of urban culture and the other is from the perspective of urban-rural symbiosis culture. Along these two different perspectives, researchers have divided the concept and connotation of the capital culture and the future development of the capital culture. The focus of this disagreement is that the future development of the cultural function of the capital is based on high-speed informatization and modernization of the city or on the basis of building a harmonious culture between man and nature. Although the literature has provided a wealth of theoretical sources, it is noteworthy that the culture perspective of the capital-city-village symbiosis is not dominant, but it breaks the single paradigm that explains the capital culture with an urban culture as the capital The deepening of cultural research provides a theoretical resource.